Critique Nursing

Essay p follow-up The single-valued function of this assignment is to critique and evaluate the elect hold in terms of expertnesss and weaknesses, to portray an downstairsstanding of the search knead. fit in to Polit and Beck (2004) the take in of scathingly appraising an denomination is an strive to determine its strengths and point of accumulations. in that locationfore, the look critique should polish an objective and balanced musing of the vignettes grimness and importee (Polit and Hungler 1999). The task of critiquing is, according to Lo Biondo-Wood and Harber (2006) a challenging one and can unaccompanied be effectively achieved through frequently radiation pattern and skill.For the conclude of this critique, the frameworks of Parahoo (1997) and Polit and Hungler (1999) book been apply as a guide. This go tabu incite in producing an organised sub-headed piece of work. epithet The title of an denomination is the first fork of a report card to be encountered and Parahoo (1997) evinces that a title should draw the lecturers attention to the slender bea of remove and make credit to the existence from whom the data is collected. Cormack (2000) and Marshall and Kelly (2007) agree, stating a title should be concise and reverberate the content of the probe.The chosen article is coroneted Perceived obstacles and facilitators to implementing uncertainty findings in the Irish practice setting. This title utilised by G deficiencyen and Chaney is concise, consisting of 13 words in filmy print. Rumrill et al (2000) resign that a trite length title is 12 15 words. However, the title does non reflect the population of the judge group i. e. Registered Nurses. Although the title stillness fork outs insight into what the article is trying to accomplish. Author(s) check to Cormack (2000) investigateers must be qualified to undertake a esearch psychoanalyse. The look intoers qualification and credentials in the articl e atomic number 18 intelligibly say and prospering to find. They two gull initials afterwards their names, one of which has a PHD, which indicate that they have an educational background. A search utilise Glacken and Chaney using the ProQuest database identifies several print articles by Glacken. jibe to Lo Biondo-Wood and Harber (2002) this enhances the credibility of a study placing confidence in the findings. The article was submitted for upshot on the 1st July 2003 and was accepted on the 9th January 2004.This illustrates that it was still relevantly recent and non dated when published which could have constitute questions regarding validity and reliability. The Journal of Clinical treat has published the article. This too adds to the credibility of the look for study, as all published articles argon double bind peer reviewed. short-change The inclination of the abstract is to provide a short comprehensive synopsis of an article (Rumrill et al 2000). According to Parahoo (1997) it should quickly taper the accepters attention on the main points of the study.Langford (2001) also assures that a well-presented abstract should be accurate, ga in that respectd and readable. This abstract confuses a brief stocky of the study and within the first hardly a(prenominal) places identifies what the study is trying to achieve to chance what registered nurses perceive as barriers to the utilisation of look for findings and discover what they perceive would facilitate the murder of these findings. The remainder of the abstract provides a thick of approach (cross- partal survey), the population (registered nurses) and boilersuit findings.One boundary remark is that the tecs do not bequeath the exact prototype size in the abstract. By reading this summary it is believed that the referee would be able to make an inform choice ab prohibited the relevance of the article for their purpose. The keywords apply within the abstract were bar riers, clinical practice, facilitators, Republic of Ireland, utilisation. It is vital that lookers choose enamour keywords for their articles in redact to aid lit searching through databases (Webb 2005).The keywords use by Glacken and Chaney argon all relevant to the research study. Introduction The purpose of the introductory element is to intelligibly come in the hassle and give a rationale for the study been carried out (Cormack 2000). Poilt and Hungler (1999) agree by stating that the foot should inform the research business and why the study is important, worthwhile and relevant. Russell (2004) also states that the insane asylum should good line the background of the research problem so that the regard for the study is apparent.The gate given by Glacken and Chaney builds a give birth from existing writings that the problem is of comme il faut value to justify further research. The former of this critique believes the research problem is in the last sentence o f the insane asylum. It states that there are many difficulties involved in achieving present based practice and many barriers that whitethorn impede research utilisation. If this is in occurrence the research problem, the researchers comply with Russells (2004) recommendation that the research problem should scat directly from the foundation and conclude this branch.However one would feel that this introduction deals to a greater extent with the importance of research quite a than explaining that the remainder of the article will concentrate on the barriers that impede research. According to Cormack (2000) an introduction should also state the studys limitations. This particular introduction does not make the studys limitations limpid to the reader. books Review/Background According to Parahoo (1997) a literature review serves to put the real study into the stage setting of what is already cognise about the subject.Cormack (2000) states that the literature review is a critical review of previous literature relating to the research idea. Therefore this section aims to provide the reader with an understanding of what the current state of evidence is in the selected area of study. This review is organised by heading that jib to the key study concepts, which makes the review easy to follow. The researchers attempt to review previous studies relating to the swipeic, olibanum preparing the ground for new research. The studies presented highlight the significance of the problem under investigation.It was difficult to identify the exact research question, as there was no definite question asked. Although Valente (2003) states that sometimes researchers may hide the research question within the purpose of the study. The final rehearsal of the literature review is therefore the purpose of this study it is timely that perceived barriers are identified and acknowledged. Therefore as you read the review it moves from broad to specific relevance with th e last section of the review vindicated outlining the need for the study. Due to the article been published in 2004, it is expected that the name and addresss employ will be relevantly recent.From reading the filename extension refer, it can be seen that this is the bailiwick and yet iii references before 1994 have been used. There was a need for these older references as the original author who giveed the Barriers scale of measurement did so in 1991 and the purpose of the 1978 reference was to illustrate that assenting to research reports has been a problem for many years. Also noted is that the articles included in the reference list are clearly related to the twitchic under study and include internationalistic resources, all breast feeding related. http//repository. uwc. ac. a/xmlui/bitstream/ hide/10566/308/RoweBlendedLearning2012. pdf? sequence=3 Method According to Polit and Hungler (1999) the heart of the research critique is the abridgment of the methodology decisions adopted in addressing the research question. Cormack (2000) alludes the method section should clearly state the research approach to be used and asks whether the method is appropriate to the research problem and whether the strengths and limitations of the approach are stated. Although not create verbally in text it is clearly pointed out that the article is of a quantitative approach.Burns and Groves (1997) describe quantitative research as a method used to gain to a greater extent t to each oneing, test relationships and uses numeric data to answer problems. In reviewing the methodology section which is under the subheading Methods, the researchers clearly demonstrate that the concept method is a cross sectioned survey using a non prospect try on. According to Polit and Hungler (1999) a cross sectional intent involves the collection of data at one point in time. This descriptive study uses the established 29 period Barriers 5 point Likert scale, after first gaining permission from the main author to employ the instrument S.Funk. Therefore a strength of this article is related to the measurement beast. The researchers used an already developed measurement pull in which the reliability of the tool would have been determined. They reinforce this fact by locution that the scale is recognised to be psychometrically robust. A further quantitative research tool a questionnaire, was selected as the method to crochet opinions regarding the barriers to research. Cormack (2000) believes that questionnaires are the most widely used method of collecting data.However he recognises that if participants are aware that they are partaking in a study, it is natural that they cogency alter their response the Hawthorne Effect (Cormack 2000). The researchers do not state how they minimised this Hawthorne Effect. In addition to the questionnaire, a demographic information sheet was utilised. This is in line with a descriptive design, as the purpose of such(prenominal) is to gain to a greater extent information about the characteristics of a group (Vitale 2003). The research participants were a convenience sample of registered nurses who enrolled in a treat focused schoolman course in Trinity College, Dublin.All who enrolled were invited to come in in the study. However the recruitment process is not described in very much detail. It is not until the Findings section that the size of the sample is revealed 169 participants responded. According to Thompson (1999) the sample size in quantitative research is preferably a large sample. Vitale (2003) states that the general rule regarding sample size is sample error decr loosenings as sample size increases. It is harder to generalise a sample of this size. It is recognised by the researchers in the sermon section that the particular elan of sampling employed may declare bias into the findings.This may result in the findings becoming less secure. A limitation noted in the met hod design used by the researchers was the lack of an explicit framework. The researchers did not identify if they used one. When researching the former(a) studies that used the Barriers scale the vast mass used a framework. Ethical context Ethics is an important part of nursing and nursing research. It is about researchers doing what is fair, decent and poser and is underpinned by values and believes of the community (Crookes and Davies 2004).There is no designated section allocated to honest considerations, however Hek (1996) states that ethical issues may be integrated passim the article. This article addresses ethical issues in both the abstract and under the method section. The researchers illuminate that the ethical issues of a persons right not to be harmed, right of full disclosure, right of self-determination, right of privacy and confidentiality were respected. According to the researcher all participants provided their consent to the study by the returning of the completed questionnaire.Consent is vital as it respects the autonomy of individuals, their right to privacy and their right to choose (Tingle and Cribb 2002). Results Cormack (2000) states that the results should be presented clearly and in enough detail so that the reader is able to judge how steady-going the findings are. Polit and Beck (2004) agree by stating that the most critical element of any study is getting your results across and understood by your readers. Valente (2003) believes that the researchers should reprise the research question before delving into the findings.The researchers in this case presented the data in compact form with little discussion at the start, but organise their findings under subheadings. According to Russell (2004) researchers frequently organise their findings by research question to facilitate readability. The aim was to quantify the barriers to research implementation. The authors of this article present their findings systematically, u tilising a variety of graphs and tables. Figure 1 shows a graph depicting that 38% of the participants consulted journals more than twice a month.Table 1 presents the barriers to research utilisation in descending order of importance. Results were also explained and summarised alongside which according to Clifford (1997) is a form of descriptive statistics. According to Russell (2004) if a descriptive design was used the reader should find descriptive statistics such as mean, mode, median and standard deviation. All these statistics are included within the results section. The target hearing (professional nurses) are more than likely to be able to get word the figures within each table and, thus, judge hoe reliable the results are.It is important that results are presented in such a way that they are clearly understood (Cormack 2000). Parahoo (1997) is an advocate of comparing results with separatewise similar studies. The researchers adopted this style and compared the top 10 barriers with those found in three recent studies (Table 3). The researchers showed their findings to be very similar with the studies undertaken in both Northern Ireland and Australia. Discussion/Conclusion The discussion section should flow from the data results and place the studys findings in context with what is already known (Parahoo 1997).Valente (2003) believes that under this section the researchers should summarise their major findings and conclude their drill to practice, research, and theory and knowledge development. The researchers state that this section will discuss the findings in likeness with other(a) studies undertaken. Valente (2003) states that author(s) should compare and contrast their results with other studies and interpret the findings. The discussion is unambiguous and back up by the results obtained. Again the researchers used subheadings to ease readability. There are many implications to practice identified by the researchers.According to Valente ( 2003) implications should describe how the results of the study could be applied to nursing practice. For example the researchers discovered that their study and many other studies identified nurses perceived lack of ascendence as the most common barrier to research. Therefore they exposed a need to implement some change into the organisational setting. Also, more support from managers was noted to be the top ranked facilitator of research implementation. The researchers also suggest a further research study, which would seek the reasons why nurses do not access research journals on a rule-governed basis. General ImpressionOverall the article was interesting with clear aims and use of methodology. It was quite simple to interpret and has provided interesting fact regarding this topic. The study consumes a few(prenominal) flaws and represents a valid example of descriptive quantitative research. The results have addressed the aims of the study and are both informative and descrip tive. It is recommended that it should contain a section of ethical consideration however the ethical issues are explicit throughout the article. In the introduction the article stresses the importance of research in nursing and health care. This builds a good case for continuing the study.Research is an essential part of all nurses role. But as this study revealed there are many barriers for nurses to overcome to right utilise and implement research. This study has brought these barriers to the foreground and identified ways to overcome them. The findings were interesting, although it might become more reliable if the study was replicated using a larger, random sample group. The top ranked barrier to research utilisation was surprising to read, as it was make known to be nurses perceived lack of authority. The article was very good overall and a lot of interesting facts emerged from the study. References